October 26, 2009
“The Summer Soldier and the Sunshine Patriot…”

From the New York Times:

A onetime engineer turned Goldman Sachs executive, Mr. Kashkari never had strong partisan instincts. Instead, following his boss Henry M. Paulson Jr. to Mr. Bush’s Treasury, he took along Wall Street’s disdain for the culture of Washington.

As the crisis in an over-leveraged financial system crested last year, that skepticism led him to question the wisdom of seeking bailout money from Congress; he feared that lawmakers would say no and trigger a catastrophic loss of confidence. But lawmakers surprised him, as did the civil servants at Treasury and the Federal Reserve that he calls “patriots” for their frantic efforts to avert disaster…

Washington’s economic bureaucrats may be patriots, but Mr. Kashkari does not see his onetime Wall Street colleagues that way. “No, they’re not,” he said. “I don’t expect every American to be a patriot. I do think Wall Street firms need to show more sensitivity.

“Every single Wall Street firm, despite their protest today, every single one benefited from our actions,” he said. “And when they get up there and say, ‘Well, we didn’t need [the $700 billion bailout],’ that’s bull. They did need it. And they’re all happy with the actions that we took, and they need to show restraint today.”

Kashkari is not alone in his surprise at the quality of civil servants. It’s common among private sector executives who assume that ability and intelligence are linked to how much money you can manage to get out of other people’s pockets. A few other examples on this point:

…From a 2000 profile in the Washington Monthly of former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin: “Who else would approach Rubin’s credibility when they argued, as he does, that the talent he served with in government matches or exceeds the talent he saw during decades at Goldman Sachs?” (Reagan’s treasury secretary, Don Regan, also discovered that his new employees were just as good as the ones he had supervised as head of Merrill Lynch.)

…From an August profile in the New Yorker of Michael Bloomberg: “[Mayor Bloomberg] also told me that he has consistently found the quality of government employees to e higher than businesspeople generally allow.”

…After spending 16 years as a federal civil servant, ending as deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, Paul H. O’Neill ran International Paper and then the troubled Alcoa Corporation — which he turned around through his emphasis on long-term planning, worker safety, eiminating executive perks, using productivity gains to retain rather than to fire workers, and keeping prices stable.

…And in 1997 the New York Times recounted the surprise of catalog companies on discovering that the U.S. Postal service did a first-rate job of taking over from UPS when the company was shut down by a strike.

All right, enough of that. I’ll only add that I’ve worked as a junior executive in a midsized private bureaucracy (the Washington Post) and very near the top of large public ones (the White House and the Federal Aviation Administration). In my experience the quality of senior management was markedly higher in the government.

Webding3.jpg

Posted by Jerome Doolittle at October 26, 2009 07:45 PM
Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Comments

So Kashkari joins Greenspan in being credulous about the actions of Wall Street bankers. This is like the store owner who pays the mob for protection and then is mystified when they come back for more money.

I too have consulted for government and big business alike and I can assure you that the level of bureaucratic ineptitude in business is even worse than in government because corporate managers are out for themselves only while government managers usually have at least some small sense of responsibility to the taxpayer.

Posted by: Charles D on October 27, 2009 9:08 AM

For fifteen years I worked as a mid-level U.S. civil service employee in the U.S. Navy Department's Strategic Systems Project Office (SSPO); where I and my immediate SSPO bosses were [in one amongst several of our job position responsibilities] in daily liaison with the UK Ministry of Defense representatives in Washington and, intermittently, face-to-face with their bosses in Whitehall. (This was then, and may still remain, Whitehall's top-priority military development-support project program in conjunction with the USA.) Over the years I observed several "rotations" of our UK counterpart civil servants (the UK civil service career pattern involves 2 to 3 years' assigned rotations---like the career assignment patterns of our U.S. military and Foreign Service Officers during their careers--- thus we Americans at SSPO [who were not required to "rotate" as frequently] got to work with a wider representation of UK civil servants). My take on this subject was: the U.S. higher-level civil servants were without doubt of notably higher capability and performance than their direct counterparts [in age, and rank] in the UK civil service. Of course that was a few decades ago, and the UK civil service in its upper ranks then still consisted significantly of coddled OxBridge/old social ties employees who had never had to be effective in anything much beyond Upper social contacts. Contrasting the representatives of the senior UK civil service ranks, were the young UK civil servants, who had more middle class or working class origins, and thus had likely gone through "lesser" colleges [more "democratized" institutions of "higher education" ---sprouting especially after WW2 in the UK] than OxBridge. To a man [in those years there were no UK civil service or military women sent to serve at the U.S. Strategic Systems Project Office in Washington] I felt these younger civil servants were easily the equal of their U.S. SSPO counterparts---which, being the U.S. Defense Department's top-priority military design, development and production and support office ---reflected some of the best of the U.S Civil Service (the observation period considered is 1967 through 1984).

Posted by: Everett Van Dorn on October 27, 2009 9:43 AM

The other side of this coin is seeing how many business leaders turn out to be bumblers when put in high-level government positions. It isn't so much a reflection on their intelligence or competence, it's just the reality that running a business and running a government office are two entirely different propositions.

Posted by: Randy H on November 1, 2009 12:03 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?