May 27, 2009
Supreme Court Pick Panders to Powerful Douchebag Base

Remember, you heard it here first. Unless you didn’t. I stole it from To Wit.

The Sotomayor panel found that calling administrators “douchebags” and encouraging students to “piss off” the principal was “the sort of language that may properly be prohibited in schools.” It also found that because that language created ”a risk of substantial disruption within the school environment,” it could properly be the subject of discipline even though it occurred off campus.

douchebag.jpg

Webding3.jpg

Posted by Jerome Doolittle at May 27, 2009 10:39 AM
Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Comments

Pales in comparison to, "Bong Hits for Jesus" recently decided by the Supremes, but certainly consistent with a conservative take on "free speech" and student's rights. I would like to know what she would have done with the strip search of the girl over the search for Motrin?

I can't say I'm thrilled with much B.O. actually does, including his nominee FOR SCOTUS, but what do the Repugnutins want, another Clarence Thomas? Seems like they would have to win the presidency to have the nomination they want, wouldn't they? I would have been alot happier with a little more extreme left wing like a defense attorney rather than a prosecutor, but that's just me.

Posted by: knowdoubt on May 27, 2009 2:06 PM

The student in the picture below doesn't seem to be addressing "administrators", so that should be okay in my opinion. Even if he looks a bit hispanic to me. You know, unshaven appearance, unorderly hair, aggressive stance ... ;-)

Posted by: Peter on May 28, 2009 9:36 AM

Excellent post/link at Suburban Guerrilla about the nominee: http://susiemadrak.com/2009/05/28/08/05/of-course-13/

Posted by: John Gall on May 28, 2009 3:40 PM

From the upholding civil rights perspective, the fly in the ointment on the douchebag case is that the student's post on her blog misrepresented the school administration's stance; the administration wanted the students to change the date of the battle of the bands, not to cancel it. Thus, the student was wrong to call the superintendent a douchebag at that point. That statement only later became true much later, after the administrators forbade the student to run for class secretary.

Had the administration in fact already been acting as douchebags at the time of the student's blog posting, I would view this decision as clearly wrong; however, when the facts are properly understood, it becomes clear that at that juncture, it was the student, and not the administration, that was acting like a douchebag.

Verdict: not my favorite case, and I would prefer if Sotomayor had dissented, but properly understood, this case involved not just a Battle of the Bands, but a Battle of the Douchebags, with the battle touched off by the student's either lying about or mistakenly characterizing the administration's actual stance; as such, to me this case is not a biggie.

Posted by: on May 29, 2009 11:16 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?