From the New York Times:
BAGHDAD — The American military has charged a contractor with assault in a case that may emerge as a major test of the military’s legal jurisdiction over civilians who accompany the armed forces into the field, military officials and legal experts said Friday.The charge was made under expanded authority that the United States Congress provided the military to crack down on contractor abuses. It is the first time since 1968 that a contractor has been charged under military law…
The contractor in the coming case, Alaa Mohammad Ali, was working as an interpreter at a combat outpost near Hit, a town in Anbar Province.
Didn’t you just know that the first guy they tried out the new law on would be a Canadian from Iraq named Mohammad?
So if the military can court marshal contractors under Military Justice, why can't they court marshal the commander in chief for war crimes?
Posted by: Buck on April 5, 2008 12:56 PM