March 22, 2007
Letter From A Birmingham Jail Redivivus

Recently the New York Times printed an article about Presidential Candidate Barack Obama that can, at best, be described as disingenuous. The Minister of Barack’s church, Reverend Jeremiah A. Wright of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, in a letter to the author of that story, lashes out at the New York Times. Although the Times may have changed, Martin Luther King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail is still relevant today.

Whatever we think of Rev. Wright’s sentiments, all of us who read the Times regularly and remember some of its more controversial writers — such as Judith Miller — share to some degree or another his concerns about whether the “Paper of Record” is fulfilling its mission. Although African American leaders may not be locked up in jails these days, distorting what they say in respectable forums can be just as devastating, or perhaps more more so, than placing them in a jail cell. Shame on the Times for distorting truth in the name of politics.

As I was just starting to say a moment ago, Jodi, out of two hours of conversation I spent approximately five to seven minutes on Barack’s taking advice from one of his trusted campaign people and deeming it unwise to make me the media spotlight on the day of his announcing his candidacy for the Presidency and what do you print? You and your editor proceeded to present to the general public a snippet, a printed “sound byte” and a titillating and tantalizing article about his disinviting me to the Invocation on the day of his announcing his candidacy.

I have never been exposed to that kind of duplicitous behavior before, and I want to write you publicly to let you know that I do not approve of it and will not be party to any further smearing of the name, the reputation, the integrity or the character of perhaps this nation’s first (and maybe even only) honest candidate offering himself for public service as the person to occupy the Oval Office.

Your editor is a sensationalist. For you to even mention that makes me doubt your credibility, and I am looking forward to see how you are going to butcher what else I had to say concerning Senator Obama’s “Spiritual Biography.” Our Conference Minister, the Reverend Jane Fisler Hoffman, a white woman who belongs to a Black church that Hannity of “Hannity and Colmes” is trying to trash, set the record straight for you in terms of who I am and in terms of who we are as the church to which Barack has belonged for over twenty years.

The president of our denomination, the Reverend John Thomas, has offered to try to help you clarify in your confused head what Trinity Church is even though you spent the entire weekend with us setting me up to interview me for what turned out to be a smear of the Senator; and yet The New York Times continues to roll on making the truth what it wants to be the truth. I do not remember reading in your article that Barack had apologized for listening to that bad information and bad advice. Did I miss it? Or did your editor cut it out? Either way, you do not have to worry about hearing anything else from me for you to edit or “spin” because you are more interested in journalism than in truth.

Forgive me for having a momentary lapse. I forgot that The New York Times was leading the bandwagon in trumpeting why it is we should have gone into an illegal war. The New York Times became George Bush and the Republican Party’s national “blog.” The New York Times played a role in the outing of Valerie Plame. I do not know why I thought The New York Times had actually repented and was going to exhibit a different kind of behavior.

Maybe it was my faith in the Jewish Holy Day of Roshashana. Maybe it was my being caught up in the euphoria of the Season of Lent; but whatever it is or was, I was sadly mistaken. There is no repentance on the part of The New York Times. There is no integrity when it comes to The Times. You should do well with that paper, Jodi. You looked me straight in my face and told me a lie!

montgomerypaper.jpg

Webding3.jpg

Posted by Buck Batard at March 22, 2007 06:29 PM
Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Comments

I think this is what is called "speaking truth to power."

Posted by: Joyful Alternative on March 23, 2007 10:15 AM

that type of preaching always gets my blood up. and being mostly swedish, if i don't get my blood up occasionally, i risk edema.

Posted by: r@d@r on March 23, 2007 2:18 PM

They did print his letter, yes? At least they get credit for allowing rebuttal.

I wonder, because he is African-American, or because he is a Christian? "..caught up in the euphoria of Lent"???

Are U freakin' kidding me???

Gee, as a long ago Catholic, giving up something I liked wasn't euphoric, I can tell ya that. Euphoric this.

Religion, bwaaaaaaa, gives me the willies.

He is shocked, shocked that gambling is allowed here, I mean that that NY Times might lie.

Sir, here's your winnings......Obama gets plenty sympathy and free publicity, yes?

Posted by: farang on March 26, 2007 5:54 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?