My sister had one of those. Very affectionate, and always a big attention-getter.
Posted by: Carl Manaster on July 7, 2006 8:20 PMPoor thing.
Posted by: Peter on July 9, 2006 4:34 AMUntil Carl commented, I thought this poor thing was a torture victim.
Posted by: Joyful Alternative on July 9, 2006 6:02 AMA cat should be able to roam the great outsides without having to put on sun lotion. Of course the poor creatures can't help it. I wonder what explanation the Creationists have for naked cats and dogs. They can't very well say it's Darwin's law applied upside down, can they? But then they also eat genetically engineered stuff.
Posted by: Peter on July 9, 2006 7:12 AMThe woman needs a fingernail job. The vet that did it to the cat seems like the best candidate.
Posted by: Buck on July 9, 2006 7:25 AMYour title is misspelled -- it should read "Ratblogging"
Posted by: Paul on July 11, 2006 8:41 PM