… Bush continues to bungle what should have been Item One in any real war on terrorism: finding and killing Osama bin Laden, and getting rid of the Taliban. Both are thriving in Pakistan while we are off frying bigger fish such as tax cuts for the wealthy.
Instead, we’re off weakening our own country by continuing to refuse to do basic, real war-on-terror stuff, such as insuring that freight entering our country is actually inspected. (And, of course, the “it costs too much” defense is ridiculous, since a number of advanced and economically successful ports abroad, such as Hong Kong, in fact do have effective, 100 percent inspection programs: “This low-cost system of inspection is being carried out with no adverse impact on the marine terminals operations and without any U.S. government funding. It could be put in place globally at a cost of $1.5 billion or roughly $10 per container.”)
And, since the apparent goal of the Bush Administration is to weaken our country as much as possible, the proactive steps that the Bush Administration has taken, such as spying on U.S. citizens with no warrant and alienating all our allies, are both ineffective at detecting terrorist plots and corrosive of the strong, liberty-based, individual-protecting model that made our country great.
(For the record, I don’t pretend to know exactly why Bush has made it his goal to weaken and tear down our country; I suspect that with respect to the president personally, it has to do with revenge against the Big Daddy father who so clearly holds him in contempt to this day. But this doesn’t explain his legions of eager enablers, both in his administration, in congress, and in the media. Some crazy self-destructive biological urge like lemmings’ mythical rush to the sea? I don’t know. But it really doesn’t matter why Bush is weakening the country in every way he can. The only important thing is to identify that it is happening, and that the process cannot be reversed until Bush is either hobbled or leaves office. More BA posts on Bush as the “Weakener-in-Chief” here.)
Only then can a real, non-scared shitless, world community-based struggle against the forces that created the murderers of 9/11 begin.

Inspection can be done at almost no cost to the public. Charge the shipper or recipient a fee equal to the cost of inspection. The Feds are charging fees for lots of other things.
Posted by: Iowan on March 10, 2006 6:46 PMIn a transparent attempt at self-promotion, I offer my short, angry rant on this topic.
I try to remain calm and reasonable, but go bat shit crazy when I see each new action by Bush. I agree, Wayne, Bush Jr. has a James Dean, East of Eden* quality about him.
Bush is creating the same America Joseph Stalin wanted, but throwing in theocracy for good measure.
*For those who haven't seen that film. Cal (James Dean) is the insecure, tortured, neurotic, disappointing/unappreciated son of Adam (Raymond Massey).
Posted by: spiiderweb on March 10, 2006 8:43 PMWell, I have to say that I "used" to be a Bush supporter in general but I have become disenchanted with him and his administration lately. Of particular interest to me is the border security issue, including the Dubai deal and the Mexico border issues. But, I also watched the previous administration selling technology and admins. before that (Carter) spinelessly let foreign interests take over an important shipping channel, namely the Panama Canal. All of these actions will put our freedom in peril in the long run.
Posted by: Geoff on March 12, 2006 9:54 PMHow long a run would that be, Geoff? Carter spinelessly rammed the treaty through over major and damaging opposition in both parties and that was almost thirty years ago. Since then there have been zero security problems with the canal.
Posted by: CCRyder on March 13, 2006 9:23 AMUmm, the Panama Canal Zone was ours on a lease. When a lease is up, you have to negotiate a new lease, not just squat there or announce you own it.
Interestingly, Guantanamo Bay is also ours on a lease.
Posted by: Joyful Alternative on March 13, 2006 11:02 AMYes, you are correct CC, this was ~30 years ago and yes there have been no security problems to my knowledge. We also haven't been to war with the Chinese and needed that canal yet. 8^) And a lease is a lease, I just think we should have renewed that lease as I look back. This happened more in my father's time than in mine, I remember him talking about it vaguely. I was just a youngie who didn't give two hoots about it. But the issue has risen in importance to me as my father got smarter, if you know what I mean.
Geoff