Bill Doolittle’s powerful lamentations in a previous post encouraged me to write this. If you’ve ever wondered how and why TV censorship got started, this article will open up your mighty eyes. Read it and weep.
During the battle over “The Last Temptation of Christ,” Wildmon claimed victory in another controversy when the creator of the “Mighty Mouse” cartoon agreed to cut 3 1/2 seconds of an episode that Wildmon had protested. The creator, Ralph Bakshi, had fallen under suspicion because of his role in making an X-rated animated feature, “Fritz the Cat.” However, Bakshi had also won an award for “Mighty Mouse” from Action for Children’s Television. In the disputed episode, Wildmon charged Bakshi with portraying Mighty Mouse as experiencing drug-induced exhilaration after inhaling the petals of a flower. Mighty Mouse had sniffed cocaine, Wildmon contended. Bakshi defended his cartoon, insisting that Wildmon had interpreted the scene out of context. However, Bakshi said he was removing the scene because of his concern that the controversy might lead children to believe that what Wildmon was saying was true. Wildmon interpreted the cut differently. “This is a de facto admission that indeed Mighty Mouse was snorting cocaine”. Wildmon said. “We have been vindicated.”

…A month after his defeat in the Mississippi House race, Wildmon made another effort to win backing for his advertiser boycott. He met with the Reverend Jerry Falwell in Lynchburg, Virginia. Falwell, the leader of The Moral Majority, was then at the peak of his career as a spokesman for the movement of conservative church groups known as the “Religious Right.” As Wildmon later told the story, he held up before Falwell a dollar bill. “The networks don’t care about your moral values, but they do care about this,” Wildmon said. According to Wildmon, Falwell didn’t require much persuading. “Great,” he said. "Let’s go with it." Wildmon said later that he believed he had reached a turning point. As he sat in his motel room that night, he was sure of victory. “Now I have the numbers,” he recalled thinking. “Now I have the clout. After three years of wandering in the wilderness, I’ve found a road to the Promised Land.”
Two months later, in February 1981, Wildmon announced the organization of the Coalition for Better Television (CBTV), the group that would bring him national recognition. His alliance with Falwell enabled Wildmon to claim that CBTV represented 200 organizations with a combined membership of over three million. These three million people were prepared to back a boycott of the three advertisers who sponsored the worst programming on television, he announced. The targets of the boycott were to be selected following three months of monitoring by 4,000 members of the coalition. The monitors would rate the offending shows on the basis of “sex incidents per hour,” scenes of violence and uses of profanity.
Can we learn something there?
I often wonder why the political left never managed to pull through a similar (consumer) boycott idea anywhere.
It's a capitalist's world. But we don't have to buy it.
Peter,
Haven't you heard of the grape boycott out here on the left coast? It was helpful(if not instrumental) in winning some UFW contracts in the 1970s. Alas, the union has pretty much collapsed today, but that's another story.
John
I remember it very well, especially the end of it. We on the East Coast boycotted grapes on behalf of, for us, abstract principles.
Having abstained from the grapes I loved for 2 years or so, I ate a lot of grapes that first night after the end of the boycott. I broke out in big, red, itchy hives all over.
Before long, all the grapes in the stores came from Chile.
Posted by: Joyful Alternative on January 8, 2006 7:35 PMJohn:
Sorry, being German I didn't know about the grape boycott.
In Germany, whenever this kind of idea pops up, there's an uproar all over the political spectrum: Stupid, you're endangering JOBS!
Well, as far as I am concerned, if DELL sponsors BUSH, I'm not going to sponsor DELL. I'll rather buy the parts somewhere else (South East Asia?) and assemble the bloody computer myself. And if I fail the first time, I'm still be better off.
I'm a union man, but the unions aren't what they used to be. Not in Germany, anyway. Too many people in there have too much to loose. So their agenda is: 1. Compromise, 2. Compromise, 3. Compromise. Until there's nothing left to concede.
Anyway, Karl Marx didn't invent added value, he just recognized it as what it is. That's why Marx' 'Capital'is still being taught in economic studies.
Can anybody earn af few billion bucks within ten years of honest work? Exactly.
Peter
PS: John Shannon as in Jack Liffey?
Posted by: Peter on January 9, 2006 10:09 AM