As a chess teacher in elementary schools, I spend a lot of time each week repeating my three rules for the opening (open two doors, bring out your knights and bishops, castle). I’ve actually reached the point, God help me, of making the kids recite the three rules with me, because fifteen minutes after the fourth time we’ve gone over them, I walk around to look at their games and they’re not following the rules they just recited.
Adults have many more concerns and distractions than second-graders. Mikhail Tal, the one-time World Champion, claims to have watched the television programs of instruction for beginners long after becoming Champion, on the theory that you can never go over the basics too often.
On that basis I allow myself to post the following description of Big Media. I hope you’ll either forgive me the repetition and examine my presentation for flaws, or ignore it altogether and go onto the next post. But who knows, some detail might be new to you. Stranger things have happened.
My inspiration is Buck’s powerful lament:
…most of the [MSM] coverage appears to be so hopelessly biased that I really do question whether the government, powerful corporate interests and media are so completely synchronized, intertwined, and in such perfect harmony with each other that we are nothing more than a fascist state…
I don’t question that. After all, let’s refresh our memories as to the definition of a fascist state:
“Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.” — Benito Mussolini.
In light of which, consider this diagram (warning: Flash animation) from The Nation, which claims to be more or less accurate as of January, 2002. It links to an article by Mark Crispin Miller, professor of media studies at New York University and director of the Project on Media Ownership, and depicts
Here’s another chart, this one from MediaChannel.org, which appears to be of similar vintage, concentrating on the big six.
Naturally some important events have taken place since then, more important than AOL Time Warner dropping the “AOL”. The consolidation continues apace.
In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the U.S. At the time, Ben Bagdikian was called “alarmist” for pointing this out in his book, The Media Monopoly. In his 4th edition, published in 1992, he wrote “in the U.S., fewer than two dozen of these extraordinary creatures own and operate 90% of the mass media” — controlling almost all of America’s newspapers, magazines, TV and radio stations, books, records, movies, videos, wire services and photo agencies. He predicted then that eventually this number would fall to about half a dozen companies. This was greeted with skepticism at the time. When the 6th edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 2000, the number had fallen to six. Since then, there have been more mergers and the scope has expanded to include new media like the Internet market. More than 1 in 4 Internet users in the U.S. now log in with AOL Time-Warner, the world’s largest media corporation.In 2004, Bagdikian’s revised and expanded book, The New Media Monopoly, shows that only 5 huge corporations — Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch’s News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) — now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric’s NBC is a close sixth.
Perhaps, as Lewis Lapham suggests (not, I believe, completely seriously), we should simply acquiesce and try to “make America the best damned fascist state the world has ever seen”; still, I think we can do better. But if we are to regain our democratic heritage, we must attack the control of media by corporations, who have no soul, are legally eternal, and only interact with human communities to exploit them.
Posted by Chuck Dupree at October 22, 2005 04:54 AM
Thanks Chuck. I don’t think that the facts you cite can be repeated enough. Repetiton is not only desired, but encouraged.
..on a side note, I was watching C-Span this morning and one of the callers derided USA Today as a “left wing commie rag”.
I find that’s the most amazing part; that coproate media has managed to create such a myth about itself that most folks simply have no idea.
Orwellian language is the order of the day.
Even left wing radio, in the form of Air America, is ultimately controlled by a right wing corporation. We can be left wing as long as the fascists will tolerate us. I agree with the diagnosis but our politics has become so corrupted and owned by the corporations, I don't know the prescription. Other than try to avoid purchasing from major corporations wherever possible.
Wal Mart is now trying to paint itself green. I guess that's because there are a few pockets of resistance that they haven't coopted yet.
Reform of major corporations is ultimately fallacious. They will still control your news and most of your choices.
It really doesn't matter how objective or fair the MSM is; it is still the MSM and it is still a tool of the fascist state. They will throw bread crumbs to the left, but the left will still have to feed at their troth.
But at least the internet, for now, gives us a place to rant. And it does provide alternatives not available on the mass media.
But who is watching?
Posted by: tstreet on October 22, 2005 10:25 AMWho is watching, t? Chuck says half a million hits last month.
Still, the Supreme Court decisions on the legal status of corporations have kept us rolling downhill for more than a century. More wrong-headed than "a sitting president can run the country and deal with a simple civil suit simultaneously."
Posted by: Joyful on October 22, 2005 10:53 AMWhen I said "who is watching", I was referring to big brother.
Posted by: tstreet on October 23, 2005 10:08 AMQuote is not originally from Mussolini. See:
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini
http://www.metalreview.com/forum/post.asp?method=ReplyQuote&REPLY_ID=66112&TOPIC_ID=4263&FORUM_ID=13
Posted by: sinful on October 24, 2005 12:41 PM